The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, are under fire following their recent visit to meet victims of the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles.

Actress and filmmaker Justine Bateman has labeled the couple as “disaster tourists,” accusing them of exploiting the tragedy for a photo opportunity.

Markle and Harry were photographed last week at a local relief center, offering comfort to displaced families and assisting in handing out supplies.

Their visit garnered significant media attention, with the couple being praised by some for their humanitarian efforts. However, Bateman, known for her roles in Family Ties and Satisfaction, has taken a critical stance.

Speaking on social media, Bateman said, “It’s hard to see this as anything other than a PR stunt. These people have lost everything, and the focus should be on helping them rebuild, not on creating glossy photo ops.”

Supporters of the Sussexes argue that their visit raised awareness of the wildfire crisis and encouraged donations to aid victims. Critics, however, claim the couple’s ongoing media presence detracts from the real issues at hand.

The LA wildfires, which have ravaged neighborhoods and displaced thousands, remain a focal point for community and celebrity-led relief efforts. Despite the backlash, Meghan and Harry continue to highlight causes they support through their Archewell Foundation, which has also pledged aid to wildfire recovery initiatives.

Neither Meghan Markle nor Prince Harry has publicly responded to Bateman’s comments. Their representatives, however, reaffirmed the couple’s commitment to helping communities in need, emphasizing that their efforts are “always motivated by compassion and service.”

As opinions remain divided, the conversation sheds light on the intersection of celebrity influence and disaster response, raising questions about how public figures can best contribute during times of crisis.